The past does not speak for itself, it is spoken for, and there
is little in the remains of mineshafts, rock piles or other physical
evidence that exists today to tell the story of the peopling
of the Michigan’s Copper Country. Nothing remains in the
Copper Country to tell us that at the turn of the century, the
Keweenaw Peninsula was the most ethnically diverse community
in Michigan. Indeed, it was among the most ethnically diverse
places in the United States. The 1870 Federal Census reveals
that Houghton County, with 57% of its population foreign-born,
had the third largest foreign-born population as a percent of
the total population in the United States (Intro
1). While in that year
71% percent of Americans had native-born parents, fewer than
5 % of Houghton County residents could make such a claim (Intro
2). Again,
for prospective, Houghton County with 96% of its population with
at least one parent of foreign birth had the greatest such percentage
in the entire United States (Intro
3). According to one child of immigrants,
the claim of native-born parentage and Americanization held a
negative connation for the residents of the Copper Country:
There ain’t no natives on the [Keweenaw] range. We’re
all foreigners up here. Sure I was born here; but my folks came
from Ireland and they stayed Irish until the day we buried the
two of them. Them Swedes, them Austrians and Polish, they’re
all the same way. . . . What I mean, we’re different from
those people downstate [Lower Peninsula]. Hell’s fire,
half them fellows in Lansing are ashamed their folks come from
Europe. Look at the way they changed their names. You don’t
see that stuff on the range. . . . We ain’t the same as
those stuck-ups downstate. That’s why I say we’re
foreigners (Intro
4).
The people of the Copper Country were indeed different from
the people of Michigan’s Lower Peninsula as pre-automobile
Michigan had very little ethnic diversity. Due to the Erie Canal,
New Englanders from western New York, or those migrating directly
from New England, mainly settled the state. The agriculture-dominated
economy of this “Yankee Michigan,” drew few immigrants
and even fewer from eastern and southern Europe. The exception
to this nineteenth-century Yankee Michigan was its Upper Peninsula
and more specifically its Keweenaw Peninsula. Indeed, in 1900,
Houghton County had the largest Chinese, Italian, Finnish, Slovenian
and Croatian communities in Michigan (Intro
5). The Calumet public schools
claimed to have enrolled children from forty different nationalities
from around the world.
The ethnic composition of the Copper Country dramatically changed
over time. Initially, the Keweenaw Peninsula drew its labor chiefly
from the British Isles, Western Europe and Canada then, after
1890, largely from southern and eastern Europe. In 1870, the
Irish were the single largest immigrant group, accounting for
nearly a third of the entire foreign-born population in Houghton
County, followed by the Cornish, French Canadians and Germans (Intro
6). By 1880, the Cornish were the single largest immigrant
group followed by the French Canadians, Irish and Germans (Intro
7). In 1890,
the Finns emerged as the single largest immigrant group, a position
they would never relinquish, followed by the French Canadians
and the Cornish (Intro
8). By the turn of the century, the Finns accounted
for a quarter of the entire foreign-born population in Houghton
County, followed by the Cornish, French Canadians and the rapidly
arriving Croatians and Slovenians, many of who were enumerated
as “Austrians (Intro
9).” In 1910, the Finns accounted for
a third of the entire foreign-born population, followed by the
Cornish, “Austrians,” and Italians (Intro
10).
The peopling of the Copper Country, like all migration, was
an economic process driven by “push factors” and “pull
factors,” that is, people were pushed out of areas that
experienced high levels of surplus labor and pulled to areas
that experienced labor shortages. With exception of the Cornish,
Irish and some Germans who arrived with previous mining experience,
most of those who peopled the Copper Country emigrated from rural
parts of Europe that were experiencing and economic upheaval.
During the last half of the nineteenth century, most of Europe
underwent the capitalist transformation of agriculture. This
shift toward market-oriented agriculture demanded greater mechanization
and thus capital investment. This process placed tremendous economic
pressure on small landholders, who, because they lacked capital,
increasingly could not compete in a market with larger landowners.
Simultaneously, mechanization reduced the need for their labor
as well as the labor of their less fortunate neighbors who were
landless peasants. As such, the capitalist transformation of
agriculture in Europe produced large numbers of people who either
became unemployed or underemployed (surplus units of labor) or
small landholders with insufficient land to survive. In search
of work, many peasants were forced to migrate to areas with labor
shortages in Europe and the United States.
Copper mining, of course, with its great demand for labor was
the “pull factor” that drew these emigrants to the
Keweenaw. Yet, this begs the question: why were the mine owners
unable to attract sufficient native-born labor? During the last
half of the nineteenth century and into the twentieth century,
there existed a dual labor market in America, that is, a secondary
labor market was created by the difficulty or danger of certain
industrial occupations that few native-born or English speaking
people from the British Isles would fill. Indeed, in 1910 the
US Senate Committee on Immigration asked mine owners in the Copper
Country why they needed so many foreign workers? Apologetically
and remorsefully, they replied: “. . . the employment of
these races [from southern and eastern Europe] is due principally
to the fact the supply of English-speaking workingmen has not
equaled the demand for labor and that it has been necessary,
in order to operate the mines, to have recourse to this source
of labor supply (Intro
11).”
This remarkable influx of immigrants dramatically impacted the
development of the Copper Country, but it also significantly
impacted the sending communities from which they emigrated. Brinje,
a small town in Croatia of around 5,000 people, sent over 700
young men to work for the Calumet and Hecla Mining Company (Intro
12). Emigration
on such levels radically altered the lives of those who remained
in Brinje. Excerpts from a 1905 letter from a Croatian schoolteacher
offers glimpse in of the lives of those left behind:
Today they are telling in the village that fifteen are going
to Fiume tomorrow by the early train, - men, women, and young
girls on their way to America. They took leave of the fatherland,
our dear Croatia . . She must let them go among strangers in
order that those who remain may live, they and their children
and their old people. And the old people die in peace because
they have hope; the little ones shall fare better than ever they
have done.
Toward evening they can be seen hurrying from house to house,
taking leave of those that they love. Who can say that there
will ever be another meeting for them? It is very late before
they have finished these visits, and the family waits for them
with impatience. With impatience, how else, when this evening
or rather the few hours still left are so short. This is the
last supper at home. There is no going to bed, for at three they
must start for the station, as the train goes at four. It is
so sad to hear them driving through the village singing a song
which expresses all the feelings of their sore hearts.
The saddest moment of all is the departure. The train has come,
they must get on board. How many tears and sobs and kisses in
our little forest and rock-bound station! Friends go with them
to Fiume -- all but the children and the old folks, who stay
in the village alone. Often the parents buy the betrothal rings
for their sons and daughters, who marry in America, and send
them to them. Faith and love come from the homeland. Finally,
at the ship good-byes must be said, the last
With what anxiety and joy do they wait for the news from
the agent that their dear ones have reached New York in safety?
There, relatives are already expecting them, and the journey
can be peacefully continued in their company. Our people generally
go to Michigan. In one town there are so many that our people
call it "New Lipa."
Twenty years ago two men went to America from here, the first
from our place to go. Now nearly half the village is in America.
It is hard to till the fields, for there are no workers to be
had. Whoever has strength and youth is at work in America. At
home are only the old men and women, and the young wives with
their children (Intro
13).
This letter reminds us of the role that immigrants played in
supporting their sending communities, the world they behind and
the pain of emigration. Such heartbreak, of course, was not limited
to Croatia. Many experienced the tears and sobs and kisses in
places like Berehaven Ireland, Camborne Cornwall, Jolitte Quebec,
Bramberg Germany, Pajala Sweden, Tronhiem Norway, San Gergio
Italy, Wasalan Finland and in hundreds of towns and villages
throughout the world.
In addition to the exceeding large foreign-born population in
the Copper Country, the children and grandchildren of the foreign-born
constituted much larger ethnic groups. In her examination of
ethnicity among Americans of European descent in the years after
the Second World War, sociologist Mary Waters has convincingly
argued that their ethnicity has largely transformed itself into
choice. That is to say, for present day Americans of European
ancestry, their ethnicity is more a matter of consent than descent.
This is an important point to our understanding of ethnicity
in the United States in the years between 1870-1930; ethnicity
was not a choice. This appears to have particularly true in the
Copper Country where newspapers listed one’s ethnicity
next to one’s name, or, quite frequently, did not bother
to list one’s name at all and simply referred to an individual
as an “Irishman,” a “Finnish trammer,” or
a “Croatian laborer.” Documents such as the Houghton
County Jail Records suggest that ethnicity had a pseudo-legal
status into the twentieth century, as the ethnicity of inmates,
not place of birth, was indicated next to their names. So to
was the case with the Calumet and Hecla Mining Company and the
Quincy Mining Company as both had their workers identified by
ethnicity on their employment records. During the 1913-14 Strike,
C & H produced bi-weekly reports that enumerated the ethnic
differential of striking and non-striking workers. Even more
extraordinary, C & H produced monthly reports on the ethnic
composition of their workers into the 1950s. So, for instance,
the head of C & H could know the exact number of Italian
trammers, French Canadian mill workers or Finnish miners on May
1, 1950 and the increase or decrease of a given ethnic group
from last month in a given job category. Needless to say, C & H
had the forms specially printed, as these were not standard business
forms in the 1950s.
What such forms, and the worldview that they represented, could
not account for, of course, was inter-ethnic marriage. There
existed no column for someone who was part German and Irish,
someone who was past Finnish part Slovenian, or perhaps someone
who was part German, Irish, Finnish and Slovenian. Ruby Jo Kennedy,
a sociologist who published in 1944 an article “Single
or Triple Melting Pot? on intermarriage in New Haven, Connecticut
observed a shift beginning in which people were moving away from
marring within their ethnic group to marring within a religion,
usually in the third generation. This process might have begun
earlier in the Copper Country. A small study of 500 households
in Calumet found that in 1910 twenty percent of all marriages
were interethnic. The Irish (66%) were the most likely marry
someone outside their ethnic group, followed by the French Canadians,
Swedes and the Cornish. Conversely, the Croatians (4%) were the
least likely marry someone outside their ethnic group, followed
by Finns, Italians and Slovenes (Intro
14).
The 1913 Copper Strike was the Keweenaw Range’s defining
moment. The strike was in many ways an ethnic conflict as much
as it was struggle between labor and capital, workers and mine
owners. In general, the newly arrived ethnic groups from southern
and eastern Europe were more likely to support the strike, while
the established ethnic groups from northern and western Europe
were less likely to support the strike. Croatian workers were
the least likely to go back to work, followed by the Hungarians,
Bulgarians and Finns. Conversely, the Cornish were the least
likely to strike, followed by the Scots, Germans and Scandinavians.
When the Calumet and Hecla Mining Company attempted to resume
underground operations in September 1913, an astonishing 94%
of Croatians continued to strike, compared to only 40% of the
total workforce (Intro
15). Croatians and Finns, with 63%, were the only
ethnic groups that had a majority of their workers who refused
to return to work (Intro
16). By the middle of December, 86% of C&H’s
Croatian workforce still remained on strike, and, as such, they
were the only ethnic group that had a majority of their workers
out on strike (Intro
17). By the end of February 1914, when the strike was
clearly lost, 84% of the Croatians continued to strike; the Finns
with 24% were the nearest ethnic group showing such solidarity (Intro
18).
Mining on the Keweenaw, like all extractive industries, declined
and ended. Just as the Copper Country saw tremendous immigration
it also experienced tremendous out migration. As mining declined
so did the need for labor and just as the Keweenaw began to experience
high levels of surplus labor, the auto industry began to experience
a near insatiable demand for labor. Most anecdotal evidence suggests
that Detroit and southeastern Michigan were the main recipient
of the Keweenaw’s out migration. Again, the “push-pull” mechanism
of labor migration drove this process. The ethnic composition
of the Copper Country not only resulted from in migration but
out migration as well, as not all ethnic groups out migrated
at the same rate. The Finns appeared the least likely to leave
the Copper Country, while the Croatians and Italians were the
most likely to out migrate (Intro
19). In general, the immigrants (the parents
or their children) remained while their children or grandchildren
left. Thus, the Keweenaw Peninsula served as an interior Ellis
Island, that is, an entry point for tens of thousands immigrants
and their children into American society.
Back in the 1990s, an often-heated debate emerged within the
pages in the Mining Journal regarding the placement of Finnish
names on street signs in Hancock. The issue brought the question
of the Copper Country’s ethnic identity into sharp focus
as non-Finns wrote and expressed a sense that the Finns were
expropriating the Copper Country, pointing out that they were
not Finns and that their ancestors had arrive from a certain
country at a certain date and worked hard in the mines. Finns
often enough responded that such sentiments were anti-Finnish
bigotry, which had long history in the Copper Country and generally
had that such anti-Finnish bigotry had its origins in other ethnic
groups envy over the achievements of the Finns. So whose Copper
Country is it? Well, first and foremost, of course, it belongs
to those who presently inhabit it, a third of whom are of Finnish
ancestry. But secondary, perhaps, it also belongs to those whose
roots are on that copper range. Perhaps the Copper Country also
belongs on some small ancestral level to the hundreds of thousands
of descendents whose ancestors spent a generation or two on that “Interior
Ellis Island.”